Using a two-stage least squares estimator for a panel of 165 countries from 2000 to 2023, the paper shows that lower wealth inequality decreases land use change emissions. The effect is most pronounced when inequality is measured by the top 10% wealth share and in developing countries, where land use change emissions constitute the majority of total emissions.
Historical contributions of carbon emissions differ widely between nations, constraining climate change negotiations. Cumulative country estimates ignore historical populations, overstating the role of large-population countries. In this paper, we present a global accounting framework. Adding CO2 emissions from land use change radically reshapes the map, moving Brazil from the world’s 8th largest creditor to the 3rd largest debtor. Yet, it does not change the position of the US, China and India.
Greater economic inequalities increase environmental degradation in most cases. Building on evidence from 136 studies and 406 empirical tests between 1998 and 2022, we construct a database enabling an in-depth analysis of the literature. Our main findings are threefold.
Ce workshop s'adresse particulièrement aux chercheurs et chercheuses. En présence de Véronica Salazar (IIE, Stockholm), Anna Papp (MIT), Ludovica Gazze (Warwick), Ondine Berland (LSE), Anouch Missirian (INRAE, TSE), Mathieu Parenti (INRAE, PSE), François Bareille (INRAE, PSAE) et Julien Wolfersberger (AgroParisTech, PSAE).
Séminaire organisé par la chaire Energie et Prospérité Quelle politique publique pour la décarbonation des sites industriels ? Réflexions à partir du cas du...
