Grass-based beef cattle production systems are generally perceived as beneficial to the environment. However, the climate impact of grass-based systems compared to systems based on energy-dense feeds remains controversial. While grass-based systems require less feed from crops, the production of which emits carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide, they generate more enteric methane emissions. Here, we provide a meta-analysis of cradle-to-farm-gate life cycle assessments of beef cattle production systems to estimate the effect of cattle diet on the carbon footprint of beef. Panel regressions indicate that every 10-percentage-point increase in grazing (resp. hay intake) at the expense of concentrates in cattle diets, based on dry matter intake, increases the carbon footprint of beef by 0.9 ± 0.35 (resp. 1.1 ± 0.5) kg CO2e per kg live weight. Lower feed efficiency and higher slaughter age are determinants of this effect. The findings highlight potential trade-offs between climate goals and other sustainability objectives (e.g., biodiversity, animal welfare).
Keywords: Life cycle assessments, beef cattle, GHG emissions, meta-analysis, grazing.
Découvrez en ligne la dernière newsletter et inscrivez vous pour recevoir la prochaine
La crise climatique est source de risques financiers désormais reconnus comme porteurs d’incertitudes multiples, et susceptibles de détériorer l’équilibre du système comme celui de ses acteurs. Ce séminaire sera l’occasion d’aborder plusieurs questions stratégiques soulevées par les risques climatiques tant pour les banques que pour les autorités de tutelle.
