Grass-based beef cattle production systems are generally perceived as beneficial to the environment. However, the climate impact of grass-based systems compared to systems based on energy-dense feeds remains controversial. While grass-based systems require less feed from crops, the production of which emits carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide, they generate more enteric methane emissions. Here, we provide a meta-analysis of cradle-to-farm-gate life cycle assessments of beef cattle production systems to estimate the effect of cattle diet on the carbon footprint of beef. Panel regressions indicate that every 10-percentage-point increase in grazing (resp. hay intake) at the expense of concentrates in cattle diets, based on dry matter intake, increases the carbon footprint of beef by 0.9 ± 0.35 (resp. 1.1 ± 0.5) kg CO2e per kg live weight. Lower feed efficiency and higher slaughter age are determinants of this effect. The findings highlight potential trade-offs between climate goals and other sustainability objectives (e.g., biodiversity, animal welfare).
Keywords: Life cycle assessments, beef cattle, GHG emissions, meta-analysis, grazing.
Ce séminaire porte sur la finance solidaire et la finance à impact qui sont considérées comme des modes de financement alternatifs ou complémentaires aux circuits financiers traditionnels. Il interroge en particulier l’évolution de ces deux types de finances au regard de leurs objectifs affichés, étant donné leur essor important depuis une quinzaine d’années.
This one-day workshop brings together researchers working on the design, evaluation, and impact of climate policies aimed at fostering the development and diffusion of low-carbon technologies. The presentations will cover a range of topics including the regulation of urban transport emissions, the integration of carbon dioxide removal into energy markets, the strategic adoption of...