While the ecological crisis is usually presented as a confrontation between mankind and nature, there remains a third term that it is imperative to keep in mind: technology, whose decisive importance Leroi-Gourhan had shown for the species history. Technology appears as made up of two fronts, which must be considered jointly: mediation with nature (i. e. the external environment), and mediation with man himself (i. e. the zoological body), whose sensitive insertion is modified. Two questions arise, relative to each of these fronts: with regard to nature, can the species succeed in a global and techno-scientific mode what it had historically succeeded in a local and dialectical mode? And with regard to man, can the eviction of traditional cultures entailed by technical development maintain the species’ capacity of long term orientation?
Hydrogen valleys, which integrate renewable energy sources, hydrogen infrastructure, and end-use applications, play a crucial role in decarbonizing industrial energy hubs. However, the large-scale deployment of hydrogen is constrained by limited renewable electricity availability and high technology costs. A key insight from our analysis is that the merit order of hydrogen end-uses is dynamic, evolving...
Cet article propose une analyse comparative d’un fonds solidaire « 90-10 » recherchant principalement la performance financière (fonds « A ») et d’un fonds solidaire spécialisé (fonds « B »), privilégiant la création d’impacts positifs sans performance financière. Ces fonds combinent les notions d’impact et de solidarité de manière hybride : communication d’une part, pratiques de financement et de sélection d’autre...
Participez à l’événement “Le rôle de la finance solidaire et de la finance à impact dans le financement de la transition : enjeux et limites“...