Published in Ecological Economics
One of the most challenging aspects of (environmental) policy impact evaluation studies is the construction of credible counterfactuals for causal inference. In this paper, we leverage a method that does not require the creation of benchmarks or the identification of external comparable control units to evaluate the effectiveness of the first three phases of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) (2005-2019) in reducing power sector fossil fuel CO2 emissions across 24 EU ETS Member States.
Considering the beginning of each trading period (phase) as a policy intervention, the paper adopts a Bayesian structural time series (BSTS) modeling framework alongside a set of contemporaneous predictors related to power sector emissions to build counterfactual estimates of emissions for each post-intervention period and analyze the policy implementation effect by comparing actual emissions with counterfactual estimates. The results indicate a statistically significant emissions reduction in the second and third phases. The dominance of the power sector within the ETS since its inception emphasizes the importance of our findings in advancing emissions reduction objectives.
Download the last version of the working paper
Le conflit au Moyen-Orient a rappelé le besoin d’accélérer la transition énergétique, mais le besoin d’investissements massifs concerne bien autres domaines. Comment les financer, alors que la pression sur les finances publiques s’accroît et que de nombreux projets ne sont pas assez rentables pour attirer spontanément les investisseurs privés ? Cette table-ronde réunira des experts...
Séminaire organisé par la chaire Energie et Prospérité Quelle politique publique pour la décarbonation des sites industriels ? Réflexions à partir du cas du...
